Safety products: SGS helps companies understand current 'Ex' marking
Utility safety: ‘Ex’ Marking can be complex. Consensus exists for how to express most of the marking for equipment that falls within the scope of IEC 60079-0 or ISO 80079-36, but it has not been reached for the hazardous area code, or marking string.
Safety products: ‘Ex’ Marking can be complex. Consensus exists for how to express most of the marking for equipment that falls within the scope of IEC 60079-0 or ISO 80079-36, but it has not been reached for the hazardous area code, or marking string.
To understand this, it is perhaps easiest to review the history of ‘Ex’ Marking. Originally, equipment marking for potentially explosive environments was fairly simple. Before the Second World War, a product was either ‘flameproof’ or ‘intrinsically safe’. Then, different types of hazardous area were identified, originally designated as Divisions, a term still used in the US. These then became Zones, with Zone 0 indicating the greatest risk and Zone 2 the least.
Manufacturers and purchasers of equipment then began to realize that the expensive incurred for protection used on ‘flameproof’ and ‘intrinsically safe’ products, was not actually necessary for equipment destined for Zone 2. This meant the ‘Zone 2’, or ‘Division 2’, equipment category was created, which became standard IEC 60079-15, providing protection in ‘normal operation’ – ‘Flameproof’ became IEC 60079-1. Manufacturers nowadays have even more options available to them with a series of protection standards, ranging up to IEC 60079-40, although not all intermediate parts are used.
Currently Electrical and Electronic Equipment is covered by nine different basic protection concepts, each one designated by a letter in the marking string – showing the suitability of a particular item of equipment for installation in a given zone. These are:
· ‘Flameproof’ IEC 60079-1: Ex d
· ‘Pressurization’ IEC 60079-2: Ex p
· ‘Powder Filled’ IEC 60079-5: Ex q
· ‘Oil Immersed’ IEC 60079-6: Ex o
· ‘Increased Safety’ IEC 60079-7: Ex e
· ‘Intrinsic Safety’ IEC 60079-11: Ex i
· ‘Non-Sparking’ IEC 60079-15: Ex n
· ‘Encapsulation’ IEC 60079-18: Ex m
· ‘Protection by enclosure for explosive dust atmosphere’ IEC 60079-31: Ex t
This system is comparatively simple, allowing for a single standard covering one type of protection and it can cover different levels of that form of protection. For example, a product covered by IEC 60079-18 ‘Encapsulation’ is identified by the letter ‘m’. This is then always followed by either ‘a’, ‘b’, or ‘c’ to show the three different levels of protection afforded by the product, giving “ma”, “mb” or “mc”.
However, equipment may also have more than one form of protection. In the case of a fluorescent luminaire, for example, it may be its lamp and terminals are covered by ‘increased safety’, its ballast may be ‘encapsulated’ or ‘powder filled’, and its isolating switch may be ‘flameproof’. This means the marking string will have ‘e’, ‘m’ or ‘q’, and ‘d’. To standardize the writing of marking strings, these are now written in alphabetical order.
The marking string must also include the Equipment Protection Level (EPL) in a single, short-form two-letter designation. This indicates the overall level of protection and, hence, the Zone for which it is most suitable. Internationally, this followed the principle already established in Europe with the ATEX Categories. The Equipment is not marked with the Zone, as that is a property of the physical location in a plant, and not a property of the equipment. Although there is a “normal correspondence” that equipment with EPL Ga can go in Zone 0, Gb in Zone 1 and Gc in Zone 2, this is not an absolute alignment and the ATEX User Directive 1999/92/EC (The DSEAR regulations in the UK) specifically allows a different alignment following a full risk assessment.
In addition, IEC 60079-0 also requires that marking for hazardous gas or vapor atmospheres and marking for hazardous dust atmospheres should not be combined. This helps to indicate that the equipment has two distinct possible uses and not that it is suitable for use in a hybrid mixture of gas and dust.
The first two parts of ISO 80079 for non-electrical equipment, parts 36 and 37, were published in 2015. They were allocated the symbol ‘h’. Marking ‘h’ is simple enough when the product is solely non-electrical but there is currently no consensus on how to mark the product if a single item of equipment has both electrical and non-electrical protection. SGS suggests stakeholders express protection in a single marking string, bringing clarity to the situation with one EPL, one Group and one Temperature Class being marked. This system is simpler, removes ambiguity and puts the potential use of the equipment beyond doubt, as can be seen in the example below:
The installer will see either:
Ex db eb h IIB T3 Gb , or
Ex db eb IIB T4 Gb
Ex h IIC T3 Ga
SGS believes that the first version is simpler and clearer.
‘Ex’ marking is a complex business even without the disagreement over the best way to express the marking string. Manufacturers need to work with a company that understands the importance of clarity, in order to be able to offer their products to the optimum number of potential customers.
SGS Explosive Atmospheres Services
SGS is the world’s leading certification specialist for equipment intended for use in explosive atmospheres. In Europe, it is a leading Notified Body, issuing certification compliant with European ATEX Directives. Internationally, it is at the forefront of the IECEx Equipment Certification Scheme, and has issued more certificates than any other certification body in the world. Its experts participate in committees formulating standards both in Europe and internationally. Learn more about SGS Explosive Atmospheres Services.
SGS is the world’s leading inspection, verification, testing and certification company. SGS is recognized as the global benchmark for quality and integrity. With more than 90,000 employees, SGS operates a network of over 2,000 offices and laboratories around the world.